Education Comparison

Why Montessori?

A comparison of teaching methods.

Conventional Montessori
Pervasive emphasis on grades, merits, social Conformity Self-humanization as root motivation
Children are grouped chronologically with one age per class Non-graded (two or three year age span)
Class generally seated, as a group, at desks Students “work” at tables, on floor; freedom of movement for lessons
Basal readers Multidimensional, more flexible reading and writing opportunities
Class, as a group, studies one subject at a time Children pursue a self-paced curriculum, individually or in small groups, in various parts of the learning environment
Children taught by “truth middlemen” Children in direct contact with the environment – (teachers, society’s conforming values) natural, sensory and cultural experiences
Class-schedules limit the child’s involvement Long blocks of time permit valuable concentration
Relatively frequent interruptions – bells, adult intervention Relatively few interruptions
Postponement of cognitive development until Kindergarten Critical cognitive skills developed before age six
Teacher society “corrects” pupils’ errors Children learn from peers, self-correcting materials; teacher’s role is that of a “guide”

Print This Page Print This Page